Skip to content

Fix Javadoc issue introduced with ba5bc94. #338

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nioertel
Copy link

Motivation and Context

Fixing Javadoc issue.

How Has This Been Tested?

n/a

Breaking Changes

No breaking changes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Problem was introduced with ba5bc94

@tzolov
Copy link
Contributor

tzolov commented Jul 17, 2025

@nioertel I believe this is resolved in the current McpSchema?
I'm closing with nothing to do. Feel free to reopen if the issue is still there.

@tzolov tzolov closed this Jul 17, 2025
@nioertel
Copy link
Author

nioertel commented Jul 17, 2025

@tzolov While my PR cannot be merged anymore as other changes have been merged since I created it, the documentation is still broken.
With Commit 8a2f97f things were changed but the resulting description for Tool#inputSchema does not make any sense as it's cut right in the middle.

I'm not sure if a new PR makes sense as change rate is too high to maintain PRs compatible with head. Please let me know how to proceed.

PS: It doesn't seem like I have permission to re-open the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants